Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
  1. Nov 10, 2022
  2. Nov 01, 2022
  3. Oct 13, 2022
  4. Sep 26, 2022
  5. Aug 09, 2022
  6. Jun 30, 2022
  7. Jun 10, 2022
  8. May 20, 2022
  9. May 18, 2022
  10. May 13, 2022
  11. May 10, 2022
  12. May 09, 2022
  13. May 06, 2022
  14. May 05, 2022
  15. Apr 29, 2022
  16. Apr 28, 2022
  17. Apr 19, 2022
  18. Apr 11, 2022
  19. Apr 05, 2022
  20. Apr 04, 2022
  21. Mar 31, 2022
  22. Mar 29, 2022
  23. Mar 28, 2022
  24. Mar 24, 2022
  25. Mar 16, 2022
  26. Feb 28, 2022
  27. Feb 24, 2022
  28. Feb 22, 2022
  29. Feb 11, 2022
  30. Feb 10, 2022
  31. Feb 04, 2022
  32. Feb 03, 2022
  33. Dec 13, 2021
    • mvelosob's avatar
      Avoid large buffer reservations with RAO (#1054) · 5e602c9f
      mvelosob authored
      Refactor the RecallTaskInjector to limit the number of tasks passed
      at once to the TapeReadSingleThread for a tape with RAO and to reserve
      disk space in smaller batchs
      
      In every call of RecallTaskInjector::synchronousFetch the injector
      will try to pop jobs from the queue so that it holds an ammount of
      work equal to the limit of files or bytes imposed by the RAO
      implementation or by the value given by the
      BulkRequestRecallMaxBytes and BulkRequestRecallMaxFiles config
      options in /etc/cta/cta-taped.conf.
      
      In every call of RecallTaskInjector::injectBulkRecalls the
      RecallTaskInjector will inject a set of tasks limited by the
      BulkRequestRecallMaxBytes and BulkRequestRecallMaxFiles config
      options in /etc/cta/cta-taped.conf to the TapeReadSingleThread
      and DiskWriteThreadPool.
      
      The disk space reservation is done once for every job batch (instead of
      all the disk space being reserved when the jobs are popped)
      
      This prevents tapeservers with RAO from reserving a large amount
      of the disk buffer upfront, which would cause the buffer to fill quickly
      by a few drives, which cannot fill it fast enough
      5e602c9f
  34. Dec 02, 2021
  35. Nov 30, 2021
    • mvelosob's avatar
      Add activity mount rules (#1026) · 245388ab
      mvelosob authored
      Activity Mount Rules associate a Mount Policy to an activity regex.
      
      When recalling a file, the users can specify an activity (i.e. by using
      filepath?activity=x). If specified, this activity will be used to select
      a matching activity mount rule, if one exists. If more than one Activity
      Mount Rule matches the activity, the one with highest retrieve priority
      will be chosen.
      
      Acitivity Mount Rules take precedence over Requester Mount Rules.
      245388ab
    • mvelosob's avatar
      Remove support for activity fair share scheduling (#1077) · 09adf3cc
      mvelosob authored
      Remove all the code associated to the activity weight fair share
      scheduling feature:
      
      - Remove catalogue functions interacting with the ACTIVITY_WEIGHTS table
      - Remove code related to activity weights from the scheduler.
      - Deprecate and mark as optional objectstore schema fields for activity
        weights (shcema should be backwards and forwards compatible).
      - Store only activity information in the drive state. In the catalogue
        methods, default the weight values to 1.0 (avoids having to perform a
      backwards incompatible catalogue upgrade)
      09adf3cc
  36. Nov 17, 2021
Loading