- May 29, 2012
-
-
Thomas White authored
-
- May 25, 2012
-
-
Thomas White authored
-
- May 22, 2012
-
-
Thomas White authored
-
Thomas White authored
-
Thomas White authored
-
Thomas White authored
-
Thomas White authored
-
Thomas White authored
-
- May 18, 2012
-
-
Thomas White authored
-
-
- May 09, 2012
-
-
Chuck authored
-
- Apr 26, 2012
-
-
Thomas White authored
This should make it much more obvious (via check-near-bragg) when the peak positions are wrong.
-
Thomas White authored
-
Thomas White authored
-
Thomas White authored
-
Thomas White authored
-
- Apr 24, 2012
-
-
Thomas White authored
-
- Apr 19, 2012
-
-
Thomas White authored
-
Thomas White authored
I'm happy that there are no gremlins here, now. This happens only for 000, where rlow and rhigh both go to zero. It doesn't make sense to have a special check for the condition.
-
Thomas White authored
-
- Apr 10, 2012
-
-
Thomas White authored
-
- Apr 05, 2012
-
-
Thomas White authored
-
Thomas White authored
-
Thomas White authored
-
Thomas White authored
-
- Apr 04, 2012
-
-
Chuck authored
-
- Apr 03, 2012
-
-
Thomas White authored
-
- Apr 02, 2012
-
-
Thomas White authored
-
- Mar 29, 2012
-
-
Thomas White authored
-
Thomas White authored
-
Chuck authored
-
- Mar 26, 2012
-
-
Thomas White authored
I'm sure I've fixed this bug many times before...
-
Thomas White authored
This fixes a not-so-subtle bug introduced by 289c8a77.
-
- Mar 23, 2012
-
-
Thomas White authored
-
Thomas White authored
-
Thomas White authored
-
Thomas White authored
-
- Mar 22, 2012
-
-
Thomas White authored
-
Thomas White authored
-
Thomas White authored
-
